A Timeline of Polarity Awareness
604 B.C. |
Lao-Tsze (born 604 B.C.)
"According to the ideas of the Taoistic religion, Tao
is divided into a principle pair of opposites,
Yang and
Yin. Yang is warmth, light,
masculinity. Yin is cold, darkness, femininity. Yang is also
heaven, Yin earth. From the Yang force arises
Schen, the celestial portion
of the human soul; and from the Yin force arises
Kwei, the earthly part." Joseph Campbell, among others, points out that the symbol for Yang and Yin shows that each quality has a little of its opposite in it, otherwise it could not relate to its opposite at all. | ||||||||||||||||||
400 B.C. |
Greeks The Greeks establish Apollonian (introverted dreaming) and Dionysian (extroverted frenzy) traditions. | ||||||||||||||||||
400 B.C. |
Plato and Aristotle
"Plato and Aristotle! These are not merely two systems;
they are also types of two distinct human natures, which from
immemorial time, under every sort of cloak, stand more or less
inimically opposed. But pre-eminently the whole medieval period
was riven by this conflict, persisting even to the present day;
moreover, this battle is the most essential content of the
history of the Christian Church. Though under different names,
always and essentially it is of Plato and Aristotle that we
speak.
Enthusiastic, mystical Platonic natures
reveal Christian ideas and
their corresponding symbols from the bottomless depths of their
souls.
Practical, ordering Aristotelian natures
build up from these
ideas and symbols a solid system, a dogma and a cult." | ||||||||||||||||||
200 - 130 B.C. |
Galen Galen identifies four temperaments due to body fluids or humors:
| ||||||||||||||||||
1635 |
John Milton Milton contrasts the sober-minded man and the gay or cheerful man. (See L'Allegro and Il Penseroso.) | ||||||||||||||||||
1795 |
Friedrich Schiller Schiller discusses psychological polarity in
Letters on the Aesthetic Education of Man.
| ||||||||||||||||||
1810 |
As a reply to Newton's theories, Goethe developed a Theory of Colour (Zur Farbenlehre, published in 1810), which became a personal obsession in his last years, and which he considered more important than his literary works, but which was not well received by contemporary scientists. Read more about Goethe's Theory of Colour. | ||||||||||||||||||
1822 |
Physiologists demonstrate the separate development of sensory and motor nerves. | ||||||||||||||||||
1871 |
Friedrich Nietzsche Nietzsche contrasts the Greek Apollonian (introverted dreaming) and Dionysian (extroverted frenzy) traditions. (See The Birth of Tragedy.) | ||||||||||||||||||
1881 |
Carl Spitteler Spitteler contrasts Prometheus (forethinker, introvert) with Epimetheus (after-thinker, extrovert) types. (See the poem Prometheus and Epimetheus.) | ||||||||||||||||||
1896 |
Furneaux Jordan Jordan contrasts the reflective type with the active type. (See Character as seen in Body and Parentage, London). | ||||||||||||||||||
1899 |
E. Kraepelin Kraepelin divides psychoses into dementia praecox and manic-depressive varieties. | ||||||||||||||||||
1902 |
Otto Gross Contrasts inferiority with contracted consciousness with inferiority with shallow consciousness. | ||||||||||||||||||
1907 |
William James becomes the first American psychologist to insist on the importance of psychological polarity. In Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking [1907], he contrasts the following attributes of tender-minded and tough-minded personalities, attributes which are nearly identical in meaning to similar terms to be offered in the 1920's by Jung under the headings of introvert and extrovert and in the 1960's by Paul Rosenfels under the headings feminine and masculine:
(See Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking.) | ||||||||||||||||||
1910 |
Willhelm Ostwald Contrasts classic with romantic types. (See Grosse Männer, biographies of scientists, Leipzig.) | ||||||||||||||||||
1921 |
Kretschmer Contrasts schizothymes with cyclothymes. Kretschmer's subtypes include "gushing jolly people" and "quiet humorists." | ||||||||||||||||||
1923 |
Carl Jung To reconcile the conflict between Freud's intuitionistic psychology and Adler's power (ie. ego) psychology, Jung focuses on gender-free polarity.
"Hence with Freud the basic formula is
sexuality,
which expresses the strongest relation between
subject and object; with Adler it is that
power
of the subject which most effectively ensures him against
the object, and gives to the subject an unassailable
isolation which amputates every relation." In Psychological Types, first published in translation in 1923, Jung presents a comprehensive history of the "type problem" in psychology.
"The existence of two distinct types is actually a fact
that has long been known: a fact that in one form or another has
dawned upon the observer of human nature or shed light upon the
brooding reflection of the thinker; presenting itself, for
example, to Goethe's intuition as the embracing principle of
systole
and
diastole.
The names and forms
in which the mechanism of introversion and extraversion has been
conceived are extremely diverse, and are, as a rule, adapted only
to the standpoint of the individual observer. Notwithstanding the
diversity of the formulations, the common basis or fundamental
idea shines constantly through; namely, in the one case an
outward movement of interest toward the object, and in the other
a movement of interest away from the object, towards the subject
and his own psychological processes."
Jung's blind spot: he doesn't appreciate mating in the civilized world. Jung's analogy of two polarized youths who come upon a castle in the wood, for example, as discussed in Two Essays on Analytical Psychology is simplistic. | ||||||||||||||||||
1923 |
Ferenczi Contrasts those who have a tendency to "blind belief" [in the power of others] with those who have a tendency to "blind disbelief" [in the power of others]. | ||||||||||||||||||
1924 |
Bleuler Bleuler updates Kraepelin's 1899 division of the psychoses into dementia praecox and manic-depressive varieties, by supplanting the former with a more comprehensive schizophrenia category. | ||||||||||||||||||
1927 |
Geoffrey Sainsbury Sandsbury's The Theory of Polarity, polarizes femininity with masculinity, time with space, music with the plastic arts, the German mentality with the French, werden with sein, change with existence, number with form, and algebra with geometry.
"What could have been achieved in mathematics had the
mathematician been hampered by the belief that plus was better
than minus? . . . Where would physics be if its
adepts had to cope with some such feeling as that motion was
better than matter?"
"My words do not contain the truth -- they point towards it." | ||||||||||||||||||
1931 |
Olaf Stapledon
"The first, and some would say the
greatest, achievement of your own 'Western' culture was the
conceiving of two ideals of conduct, both essential to the
spirit's well-being.
Socrates,
delighting in the truth for its
own sake and not merely for practical ends, glorified unbiased
thinking, honesty of mind and speech.
Jesus,
delighting in the
actual human persons around him, and in that flavour of divinity
which, for him, pervaded the world, stood for unselfish love of
neighbours and of God. Socrates woke to the ideal of
dispassionate intelligence, Jesus to the ideal of passionate yet
self-oblivious worship. Socrates urged intellectual integrity,
Jesus integrity of will. Each, of course, though starting with a
different emphasis, involved the other.
| ||||||||||||||||||
1946 |
P. L. Harriman Contrasts schizoid and cycloid types with those of Kretschmer:
"The cycloid
is basically good-natured and sociable, a person who swings from
cheerfulness to depression. The
schizoid
is basically
humorless and unsocial, a person who has warring within him at
the same time shyness, oversensitive refined feeling, and
insensitive, dull-witted, and sulky affectivity. It should be
emphasized that these cycloid and schizoid traits are, on the one
hand, transitional developments short of their clearly abnormal
counterparts, and, on the other hand, not
necessarily related to the healthy biotypes Kretschmer designated
as cyclothymes and
schizothymes." | ||||||||||||||||||
1950 |
Albert Wellek Contrasts Expansivitaet and Defensivitaet, Angriffslust and Genussucht, Empfaenglichkeit and Sinnlichkeit. (In German orthography these are Expansivität and Defensivität, Angriffslust and Genußsucht, Empfänglichkeit and Sinnlichkeit. See Polarity in Character Structure: A System of Characterology.) | ||||||||||||||||||
1950 |
Efforts to clarify human typology continue to be ensnared in semantic nonsense. Consider as but one example the following abuse of type terminology:
"type, reversal. Abraham and Jones use this expression for persons with a tendency to act in a way contrary to normal. They may express contrary opinions, though they know them to be illogical; they may dress 'out of style'; they may enumerate irrelevant items, etc."
| ||||||||||||||||||
1962 |
Uses polarity in
Psychoanalysis and Civilization
(1962) to develop a consistent and coherent description of human
nature in its entirety. In
Homosexuality: The Psychology of the Creative Process
(1971), claims that a son will always polarize with his father
and a daughter with her mother.
Paul uses:
Paul describes in detail the ordinary world of human reality in which ordinary people find themselves. His theories are simple, despite a sometimes academic style. | ||||||||||||||||||
1970? |
Charlotte Bach Unpublished writings by Bach are used by a British group. | ||||||||||||||||||
1971 |
Sonja Carl Gilligan Gilligan contrasts the Withdrawn Type with the Controlled Type. (See The Heterosexuals are Coming: The Fusion Strategy.) |
-- prepared by in 1988 and revised by in 2007
[D:\dh\web\NSC\3.1\HTP\Timeline.htp (615 lines) 2008-01-14 14:30 Dean Hannotte] [D:\DH\NSC\JAMES.HTH (13 lines) 1998-09-26 10:53 Dean Hannotte] |