In Defense of the Constitution refutes modern critics of the Constitution who assail it as “reactionary” or “undemocratic.” The author argues that modern disciples of Progressivism are determined to centralize political control in Washington, D.C., to achieve their goal of an egalitarian national society. Furthermore, he contends, Progressive interpreters of the Constitution subtly distort fundamental principles of the Constitution for the precise purpose of achieving their egalitarian goals. It is in their distrust of self-government and representative institutions that Progressivists advocate, albeit indirectly, an elitist regime based on the power of the Supreme Court?or judicial supremacy. Key elements and issues in this transformation of the original republic into an egalitarian mass society are thoroughly examined.
In Defense of the Constitution, revised and expanded edition, (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1995).
The copyright to this edition, in both print and electronic forms, is held by Liberty Fund, Inc.
This material is provided on this disk to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. Unless otherwise stated in the Copyright Information section above, this material may be used freely for educational and academic purposes. It may not be used in any way for profit.
HTML | 769.22 KB | This version has been converted from the original text. Every effort has been taken to translate the unique features of the printed book into the HTML medium. |
HTML by Chapter | (varies) | View this title one chapter at a time. |